传统溯源跟区块链溯源的最大特点是溯源数据不可篡改，好处不言而喻，但是质量信息跟传统溯源一样得不到有效保证，没有质量安全的溯源都是耍牛氓。
The greatest feature of the traditional traceability and of the chain of blocks is that the trace data are inexorable and that the benefits are self-evident, but quality information, like traditional traceability, is not effectively guaranteed, and the absence of quality security is a trickery.
我们该思考一下怎么解决产品质量的溯源，就像你溯源到了狂犬疫苗是长生生物生产的又能怎么样呢?没办法保证质量的前提下已经造成了危害。
Let's think about how to deal with the traceability of product quality, like when you trace the rabies vaccine to the production of life-long organisms. The damage has already been done without quality assurance.
那说说国家如何杜绝大面积的产品质量安全问题?
How does the State eliminate large-scale product quality safety problems?
政府会拿出很大一部分资金，交给第三方检测企业去市场上对产品抽检，从原料、生产过程、包装、物流、库存、销售阶段都会抽检，针对不同的产品都有抽检标准(我们叫检验检测标准的抽检方法，经过科学论证的)，这样才会让不合格的产品流入不到消费者手中。
A large portion of the Government's funds is allocated to third-party testing firms to screen products on the market, from raw materials, production processes, packaging, logistics, inventories and marketing stages, and for different products (which we call test-testing methods, scientifically proven) so that unqualified products do not flow into the hands of consumers.
政府不做检验检测，只监督检验检测，这样公平公正，但依然会有漏网之鱼，因为利益问题，像三鹿奶粉，长生疫苗等事件，如果监督这方面不解决好，后期依然会有这些事件爆发。
While the Government does not conduct tests, it only supervises tests, which is fair and fair, there will still be leaking fish due to interest issues, such as milk powder and permanent vaccines, which will continue to occur at a later stage if oversight is not resolved.
既然抽检保证了大部分的产品质量安全，那这块我们能不能用区块链来解决呢?把这个大部分产品质量安全再扩大一下范围呢?如果区块链来解决应该从哪个地方入手?Google了一下，的确可以的，并且发现了两个这种类型的产品。根据个人的对比做了个排序(就俩，哈哈)
Now that the sample has ensured the quality of most of the products, can we use the block chain to solve them? What about extending the quality security of most of the products? Where should the block chain start? Google did, and found two of these types of products. Sorted them according to personal comparisons.
1、LIMSChain (http://limschain.org )，没找到中文名字。
1 LIMS Chain (http://limschin.org), no Chinese name found.
他们的做法是通过给检验检测企业提供免费的LIMS系统，在检验检测环节通过物联网把所有检测流程及数据固化到区块链上，这样也不用管产品原料是什么，只要通不过检测那么就是不合格。这估计是所有产品质量数据的关键一环，看白皮书也是这样说的 O(∩_∩)O哈哈~。
They do so by providing testing companies with a free LIMS system that solidifies all the testing processes and data into the block chain through a network of tests, so that they do not care what the raw material of the product is, as long as it does not pass the test, is not qualified. This is an essential part of the quality data for all products, as is said in the White Paper.
2、质量链( http://www.cloudchain.cn )，山东浪潮集团发起的，资源看着也牛逼。
2. Quality chain (http://www.cloudchain.cn), initiated by the Shandong Wave Group, with resources that are seen as powerful.
他们的方式跟LIMSChain差不多，但是只提供链，没看到给各方角色提供的Dapp。也就是说各方角色自愿上传数据，这样其实是给各方增加了工作量，要知道检测企业的一套LIMS系统要上百万的。这样上传的数据全看各方自愿，又跟溯源差不多了，没办法保证数据的原始性，也就保证不了质量吧。还有一个问题是质量链用的是联盟链，没有币的激励就不能调动大众参与质量监督。
Their approach is similar to that of LIMS Chain, but they do not see the Dapp for the players. That is to say, the voluntary uploading of data by the players increases the workload, knowing that the company’s LIMS system will cost millions.
注册有任何问题请添加 微信：MVIP619 拉你进入群
打开微信扫一扫
添加客服
进入交流群
发表评论